Build a demo school vote in under two minutes — pick a scenario, customize the ballot, preview the voter experience, and see a decision-legitimacy report. No signup, no real votes, runs entirely in your browser.
Try clicking an option →
Students self-censor when they believe school surveys can be traced. Parents question whether feedback was handled fairly. Administrators see vote totals without knowing whether voters were informed, confused, pressured, or disengaged. True Anonymity was built for the decisions where ordinary forms aren't enough.
True Anonymity is built around them — not as four features bolted onto a form, but as one connected system.
One-time codes prove eligibility. The submitted ballot is saved separately from the code. Admins see results, not identities.
Interactive briefing cards and optional clarity checks measure whether voters actually grasped the issue — never as a score that blocks voting.
Guided question builder, ballot balance check, and structured abstention categories so silence isn't mistaken for consent.
Decision-legitimacy report: mandate strength, abstention diagnosis, data-quality flags, and a recommended next step.
Every ballot includes "I'd rather not answer". Voters who pick it choose one of five reasons. Each category points to a different institutional failure, so the same dashboard tells you whether the problem is communication, trust, options, relevance, or coercion.
"I wasn't informed enough." If 40% pick this, the communication failed — the people didn't.
"I don't trust this process." A vote that can't measure distrust in its own process is incomplete. True Anonymity can.
"None of the options work." When 30% reject every choice, the ballot design was wrong — not the voters.
"This doesn't affect me." Separates real apathy from "I just don't have skin in this game."
"I don't feel comfortable choosing." Surfaces social coercion that any honest school deserves to know about.
Did the people who said "uninformed" actually open the briefing? The dashboard splits information failure from comprehension failure.
Most voting tools dump you in a 12-field form and call it "setup". True Anonymity walks operators through six clear steps — same progress bar on every page, so you always know what's next.
Quick poll, formal election, sensitive survey, deliberation vote — defaults match the stakes.
Interactive cards, balanced explanations, optional clarity checks. Auto-generator turns 5 short fields into the full flow.
Guided question builder with the five-category abstention framework built in.
QR sheets, email, parent-friendly sharing. One-time codes — no accounts to manage.
Voters vote or abstain with structured reasons. No live results until the deadline.
Outcome, mandate strength, abstention diagnosis, data-quality flags, recommended next step.
Don't replace Google Forms for lunch polls and field-trip preference. Use True Anonymity when the result has to be defensible.
| Need | Google Forms | True Anonymity |
|---|---|---|
| Quick classroom survey | Good | Good |
| Anonymous sensitive feedback | Limited trust | Built for it |
| Student council election | Possible | Purpose-built |
| Pre-vote briefing | Manual | Built in |
| Abstention reasons | Manual | Automatic, 5 categories |
| Ballot fairness checks | No | Yes |
| Decision legitimacy report | No | Yes |
| Parent / student privacy explanation | Manual | Built in |
One-code-one-vote with candidate briefings and turnout floors. The legitimacy report tells the new council whether their mandate is strong, moderate, or thin.
Interactive briefings help students grasp the tradeoffs before voting. Abstention diagnosis shows whether silence meant "uninformed", "no opinion", or "this doesn't affect me".
Bilingual EN / 繁體中文 explanations and protected response handling. Parents see exactly what the school can and cannot see before they participate.
Safety, belonging, trust, and pressure measured without exposing individual students. Pressure-barrier abstentions surface coercion the school can't otherwise see.
Let the community rank projects while the system reports whether voters actually understood the tradeoffs — high turnout with weak comprehension is a different result than high turnout with strong comprehension.
Mode-matched defaults: ceremony level, recommended turnout floor, default visibility, briefing-required flag. Pick one and the form is already half-filled.
After every vote closes, True Anonymity produces a structured decision-legitimacy report. Not "X% chose A" — a layered diagnostic that tells the school whether the result is ready to act on, and what to do if it isn't.
This is where True Anonymity stops looking like a form tool and becomes a decision platform.
True Anonymity does not solve social anonymity by itself — schools still need responsible code distribution. We document the distribution protocols and threat model so administrators know exactly what the software protects and what it doesn't.
True Anonymity was built first for international and bilingual private schools in Taiwan — the place where trust dynamics, hierarchy, and bilingual communication all meet.
Full UI in both languages. Voters pick their language at the start; admins manage in either.
Printable QR sheets for sealed-envelope distribution. LINE-friendly links for parent communication.
School logo on voter pages, printable parent letters, bilingual result reports.